Protecting Food & Beverage Recipe and Process Ownership

TASA ID: 1926

What are the appropriate steps toward protecting the recipe and process for making new food and beverage products? And what are the more likely challenge points a company may make to protect its corporate infringement claims? Since new product introductions are the lifeblood for sales growth in every company, it is imperative that proper processes and policies are implemented to protect future brand equity and sales growth potential.

In the global marketplace, only two new product categories exist, "new and unique products" and "line extension products." New innovative food and beverage products are more valued because they represent the greatest sales growth potential. New product line extensions have less marketplace business risk, and offer the potential for short term sales boosts. These products are often incorporated into LTO (Limited Time Only) marketing campaigns. Most R&D departments have the ability to create these products in a relatively short time, often months vs. years for totally unique new products. In either case, it is critical that companies take careful and calculated steps to protect both the recipes and processes for making these products.

The "Intellectual Defense Shield" Process

For most companies, the "intellectual defense shield" begins with meticulous note recording in laboratory notebooks, signed and dated by the author or scientist, and witnessed by another party. The second step is the completion of Mutual Non-Disclosure (MNDA) Agreements between a food and beverage company and any suppliers with whom they plan to do business.  A third step represents "Product Development Agreements" (PDA) that define the level of product ownership between a company and its suppliers.  The fourth step reflects the development of a product specification and a process specification. A product specification both defines the finished product and becomes the standard for purchasing the product. A process specification is used infrequently within the food and beverage industry because purchasing or supply chain management departments want greater latitude in purchasing from a broader customer base - but at the risk of intellectual property ownership.

Parsing Product Development Agreements

Product development agreements between a customer company and supplier address several key issues: 1) the definition of "similar products," 2) degree of intellectual property ownership, 3) length of supplier exclusivity, 4) future technical development partnership, and 5) potential food cost Implications.

Most product development agreements seek to define "similar (or dissimilar) products" so that both the customer and supplier can continue to grow and expand their sales of "dissimilar products." As a result, the legal sticking points are always in the wording. In most situations, agreements attempt to define sensory (flavor and texture), analytical, functional, and engineered differences. In every situation, the legal agreement will define objective differences that can be substantiated through third party-testing if necessary. The most rigid standard for measuring dissimilar food and beverage products is "Triangle Sensory Tests." The triangle test requires consumers to pick the "different" product out of three product options. The other two options are the same product. Less restrictive consumer "product preference" tests can also be written into agreements. A company will choose to use more restrictive consumer tests if they feel they have a very unique food product.  A product development agreement may also define specific analytical tests to document product dissimilarity, such as a salt analysis or liquid chromatography tests that identify specific flavor components.

Product development agreements may also define the degree of share ownership of intellectual property. For example, a supplier may make full disclosure of unique technology used in a food product in exchange for exclusive ingredient sales for a specified time period at an agreed upon price. Upon agreement termination, the agreement may also define which competitors can gain access to the previous unique technology. Agreements may also define a "Cost Plus" pricing formula with no competition or a second supplier with limited sales scope so that a second supplier is qualified to mitigate "Act of God" crises. Another successful purchasing agreement provides for an exclusive supplier agreement at a fixed profit level with an agreement to share continuous cost savings at a specified rate for a fixed time.

Product Specification

Most food and beverage product specifications contain the following information categories: food label ingredient statement, product definition, sensory characteristics (taste, texture, color, aroma), analytical specifications (moisture, salt, size, protein, and sugar contents, etc.), functional characteristics (softness vs. firmness, height, weight, etc.), microbiological specifications (for both pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms), shelf-life limitations, inner and outer case packaging, pallet configurations, barcode information, and distribution temperature requirements. The most common failures of product specifications are accuracy, scope, and definition of "as-is" product characteristics vs. "ready-to-eat" product characteristics.

Process Specification

The process specification defines the process used to harvest, process, and package the finished product before it enters the marketplace. Most process specifications contain the following information: ingredient listing and recipe, process equipment control settings (production line speed, internal product temperatures, product appearance during each unit process, etc.), sequence of process steps (such as washing, sanitizing, sorting, cutting, cooking, packaging, and freezing, etc.), equipment specifications (like model number, size, unique processes, etc.), and unique processing steps that differentiate the process from competitors.

Patent vs. Trade Secret Intellectual Knowledge

For innovative and unique new product development, every food and beverage company is required to protect their intellectual property through a patent or trade secret. A patent represents full disclosure of intellectual property and defines a product's differences from similar or disparate products. The patent application development and approval process is long and laborsome, and is rarely completed before the new product is introduced to consumers. A company can mitigate its intellectual risk by making sure that all intellectual property is fully documented and the patent has been applied for. The downside of the patent process is full intellectual disclosure, while the upside represents protection from competitors for an extended period of time. Pharmaceutical and electronic industries use patents more extensively than food and beverage companies.

Trade secrets are used by companies that have a high degree of confidence that competitors cannot replicate their product due to their own discovery, or the replication of the product would take competitors years to decode. A trade secret protects a company from competitive sales, but generally for a shorter period of time than a patent would. Trade secrets are also used to restrict current and former employees from using the confidential information. To prevent employees from using the information, companies may ask suppliers to code the ingredients as Product A or B. To further protect trade secrets, a company will often develop and sign binding agreements with both ingredient and equipment suppliers so that they have exclusive rights to those ingredients and equipment processes. Since most ingredients contained in trade secrets are 'functional ingredients," suppliers of these ingredients are reluctant to sign binding agreements because their sales growth depends on volume sales to multiple customers.

Substantiating Consumer Labeling and Media Claims

Thorough documentation of new product intellectual property is essential to substantiating consumer labeling and media claims as required by government law. Consumer labeling claims may include "new and improved," "healthier for you," "lowers cholesterol," "improves digestion" (like Prebiotics and Probiotics), "organic," "Range Raised," "All Natural," or "Naturally Processed." Certain descriptors can only be used in accordance with Federal statutes regarding "Organic" or "Natural," etc. All claims need to have detailed information recorded in a safe location that substantiates these claims. Many times that information should include pictures and videos to support written documentation.

Media claims can range from legitimate product claims that demonstrate consumer preferences to blatant corporate attacks that challenge the size and taste of competitive products. Marketing departments may wish to state that a certain demographic customer profile prefers their product over a competitor's product. The documentation threshold for media claims is often lower than labeling claims.

Major Brand Equity and Product Liability Business Risks

Future food and beverage legal agreements need to provide additional substantiation that demonstrates that product and process specifications limit brand equity and product liability risks. For example, it is recommended that pathogenic organism testing (like E. coli testing) defines test locations within a manufacturing plant, frequency of testing, and test typing, etc. It is further recommended that Critical Control Points of HACCP programs be defined with corrective action steps. Since millions of dollars and a company's existence depend on safe food to customers, it is imperative that companies err on the side of over-documentation to protect their consumers and business equity.

New Intellectual Ownership Frontiers

There are several new frontiers of intellectual ownership in the food and beverage industry that have yet to be vetted in the United States court system. As a result, these new frontiers require extra documentation to remove as much subjectivity of differences as possible. Some examples include:

  • Organic food products, and the processes used to harvest, clean, process, package, and distribute them into the marketplace
  • Home-grown and hand-processing vs. industrialized processing
  • Animal welfare best practices
  • Sustainable replenishment best practices

Above and Beyond Best Food Safety Practices

Fortunately, some companies, like a major Canadian food company, are taking their food safety documentation above and beyond current best practices. On December 9, 2009, they formed an independent Food Safety Advisory Board that provides critical assessment of their current food safety program in three critical areas: 1) Performing ongoing critical reviews of the company's food safety strategy that will include recommendations on additions or modifications to advance their programs, 2) Providing insights on any emerging food safety risks, and 3) Providing guidance for their employee training and education programs. And still, other companies are including Six Sigma, Kaizen, Safe Quality Food (SQF) best practices. Although food safety practices have not traditionally been included in intellectual food property, they may be more important than ever in the future.


This article discusses issues of general interest and does not give any specific legal or business advice pertaining to any specific circumstances.  Before acting upon any of its information, you should obtain appropriate advice from a lawyer or other qualified professional.

This article may not be duplicated, altered, distributed, saved, incorporated into another document or website, or otherwise modified without the permission of TASA.

Previous A Primer on the Valuation of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Capital, and Intangible Assets
Next CAUTION! CAD Drawings May Be Fatal To Your Design Patent
Tasa ID1926


Let Us Find Your Expert 

Note: This form is to be completed by legal and insurance professionals ONLY. If you are a party in a case that requires an expert witness, please have your attorney contact TASA at 800-523-2319.


Search Experts

TASA provides a variety of quality, independent experts who meet your case criteria. Search our extensive list of experts now.

Search Experts


  • I think it's always good to have access to experts when [TASA] make[s] the process so easy."

    Scott McIntosh, Lewis McIntosh & Teare, Royersford, PA

  • As a busy practitioner, managing a sizeable caseload, I can use all of the help available to me. If I can outsource a task, particularly one as important as securing a qualified expert, I will jump at the opportunity. I use TASA in nearly every case where I need to find an expert witness, be it an engineer, an architect, an economist, etc. They have thousands of qualified experts to refer in virtually any field. Best of all the process is extremely simple. When I need an expert I simply contact TASA, whose knowledgeable representatives ask you targeted questions about your case, your legal theories, and your goals, in order to find the right expert for your case. I usually receive CVs and calls from the potential expert within hours. If you find the originally selected person is not a good fit – for whatever reason – TASA will work with you to find the right person. I would happily recommend this service to any attorney."

    Patrick K. Gibson, Gibson & Perkins PC, Media, PA

  • Ms. Darlie I. McDonald RN was awesome on the witness stand, and we prevailed in our case to the tune of  [a] (highly unusual [amount] for a medical malpractice [case] in our area).  I'd highly recommend her."

    Shane Reed, Shane A. Reed Law Office, Jacksonville, OR

  • I appreciate your inquiries and offers of assistance as well as the consistently high-quality, well-organized, and erudite TASA webinars, which invariably have excellent presenters."

    Maurice S. Kane, Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates PC, Riverside, CA

  • Steven Kursh was an outstanding technical expert on our ecommerce IP lawsuit. He completed a massive amount of work on extremely complicated material, in a very short period of time. His work product was first rate and I think he would have done a terrific job if the case proceeded to trial. He is very articulate and helped us. I only wish we had gotten him involved sooner in the litigation."

    Daniel J. Brown, Reiss Sheppe LLP, New York, NY

  • I thank you all for the response to my request for an expert witness...Both Mr. Scott and Mr. Bianchi appear to be well-qualified for this case, but we have hired another expert. As always, I was impressed by TASA's ability to produce exceptionally well-qualified candidates with great speed."

    John Thomas Dzialo, The Law Offices of John Thomas Dzialo, Santa Ana, CA

  • Thank you for your quick response and the names of the two proposed experts. The situation that gave rise to our search for these experts has resolved and we will not need to retain them. However, we will continue to keep TASA in mind as these needs arise from time to time as your breadth of coverage for experts of all types is unparalleled, in my experience."

    Bart W. Brizzee, County of San Bernadino, San Bernadino, CA

  • I have used TASA for the last five years for locating an expert for many personal injury cases. On each and every occasion, TASA was able to find me more than one qualified expert. With such a variety of experts, I was able to select one who met my client's needs in prosecuting these claims. I found the experts TASA referred not only qualified, but available on a moment's notice. Your fees are reasonable and fair, and I will continue to use TASA for the remainder of my career."

    Robert Oushalem, Esq., The Law Office of Robert Oushalem, San Jose, CA

  • I recently used TASA for the first time to locate an expert to testify in a case requiring rather unusual expertise and where there were no applicable regulations or standards for guidance. TASA referred an expert in California who was everything a lawyer looks for in a forensic expert. He was promptly available for consultation, efficiently prepared for deposition and trial and very persuasive and credible with the jury. TASA's administrative services and assistance in locating this expert were excellent, and we would certainly use both the expert and TASA in the future."

    Theodore Phillips, Miller Hauser Law Group, LLP, Placerville, CA

  • TASA has always given me first-class service, but in a recent matter, TASA found the 'needle-in-the-haystack' expert witness we feared didn't exist. We needed an expert for a very narrow and limited issue in a very narrow and limited industry. Because TASA has an extensive expert witness database, it was able to give us a referral almost on the spot. It's why I always turn to TASA first."

    Kathleen A. Herdell, Law Offices of Kathleen A. Herdell, St. Helena, CA

  • There are numerous companies that provide litigation experts. However, I always choose the TASA Group because of their quick response in finding a qualified expert for my particular case. I have extreme confidence in the TASA Group and will continue to use their services in the future."

    Katie A. Killion, Esq., Chiurazzi & Mengine, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA

  • I spent hours trying to locate an expert in a very technical case involving a defect in a medical device. I could have saved a lot of time by calling TASA first. Within hours, I was supplied with the name of an engineer who had more than 30 years of job training, education and expertise in the precise area involving the device. Bravo TASA!"

    Timothy W. Peach, Partner, Peach & Weathers, San Bernardino, CA

  • We were involved in a case pending for more than five years with seven parties from three states. Three mediations failed before we looked to TASA for an expert. TASA referred an expert who clearly understood the complexity of the project and could effectively support his opinion. If it weren't for his expert advice and deposition testimony, the case would not have settled. Interestingly, the case settled within 90 days from the date this expert began."

    Renee Colbert, Esq., Corporate Counsel, W.G. Tomko, Inc., Finleyville, PA

  • Using TASA to find experts for defending our client in a negligent homicide case ended up being one of the most important decisions we made in trial preparation. The experts they suggested were exactly what we needed for the case. I truly did not expect to find experts that would be such a perfect fit for the nature of case. TASA provided us with highly qualified experts in somewhat narrow fields of expertise. A large percentage of our victory is due to the experts recommended by TASA."

    Marta Farmer, Esq., Carl S. White Law Office, Haver, MT

  • I have used TASA's services since the 1980's and have never been disappointed. TASA is indispensable for locating that hard-to-find expert. TASA representatives have always been courteous and pleasant, with the attitude that they cannot do enough to help. I expect to continue using TASA throughout my career."

    Brad W. Greenberg, Esq., Smyth Law Offices, P.C., Brockton, MA

  • I needed to retain a multitude of scientists from a variety of disciplines for a complex litigation. Initially, I went through a series of interviews with an extremely knowledgeable and professional team of TASA advisors. They were able to find highly qualified experts in the specific fields, all of whom turned out to be superior in qualification and area of expertise to my adversary’s experts. I am a TASA believer!"

    Nooshin Namazi, Partner, Nicoletti Hornig & Sweeney, New York, NY

  • TASA always comes through in the difficult IP cases. Their representatives work with you to refine the search criteria and quickly send you a list of very qualified experts."

    Timothy L. Boller, Principal, Seed Intellectual Property Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA

  • Special thanks to our TASA referral advisor for her quick response to our initial request—we were extremely happy with how fast TASA was able to assist us! Your group does excellent work, and it is always my first stop when looking for an expert."

    Susanne K. Sullivan, Senior Attorney, Southwest Airlines Corporation, Dallas, TX

  • When we needed an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit, we turned to TASA. We were looking for a witness qualified in two unrelated technical areas, and TASA worked with us to identify and refine our requirements. TASA performed well, promptly providing us with several excellent candidates to consider, one of whom we retained."

    Joseph T. Miotke, Partner, IP Practice Group, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI

  • Our team had a very positive experience with TASA. The Expert was professional, efficient, and certainly an expert in his field. His work and testimony contributed to a winning decision for our client! We will recommend the Expert and TASA whenever appropriate."

    Stephanie Sprague, Esq., CT

  • (The Expert) WAS A PERFECT FIT for my case: qualified, competent, easy to work with, attentive to detail, knowledgeable, smart, communicative, enthusiastic, resourceful—have I left anything out? I highly recommend TASA and would be happy to share my experience with anyone else. Thank you!"

    Michael Porrazzo, Esq., The Porrazzo Law Firm, Mission Viejo, CA

  • The expert was very thorough. TASA was quick to respond with an answer to my request. I have used TASA in the past under various other law firms and have been pleased. TASA continues to live up to expectations and then some."

    Anne Desormier-Cartwright, Esq., Jupiter, FL

  • Your organization found us an appropriate expert witness in less than one day. This was excellent service. The expert you found was excellent and a pleasure to work with."

    William A. Ehrlich, Esq., Allentown, PA

  • (The Expert)…accomplished exactly what we wanted. TASA was very prompt and efficient in locating him. All fees were reasonable."

    J. Michael Lehman, Esq., Bruce, Bruce, & Lehman, Wichita, KS

  • We needed an Internet expert right away to meet a deadline. One phone call to TASA, and in less than a day, TASA called back with a list of 8-10 experts who were exactly what I needed. The TASA expert I chose knew the business and mechanics of the Internet so well—he was a PhD and professor who had written a book on the subject—that he put the fear of truth in the defendant that caused him to settle. When I get the kind of service that I did from TASA, I stick with it and use it again and again."

    Philip Green, Attorney at Law, Green and Green, San Rafael and San Francisco, CA

  • Excellent—in a word. I just do not have the time to hunt for experts. (The Expert) was fantastic. Thank you for providing such a quality service."

    Francesca Carinci, Esq., Steubenville, OH

  • TASA stands for Tops At Serving Attorneys. It’s always rewarding working with TASA."

    Marshall A. Bernstein, Esq., Philadelphia, PA.

  • That was, however, one of the best and most interesting webinars I've seen in the last few years.  Thank you for hosting it and introducing me to such a knowledgeable and caring person." - Referencing the Medicolegal Consequences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Civilian and Military Populations webinar. 

    Lori Bauer Apodaca, The Law Office of Lori Bauer Apodaca, Los Lunas, NM 

  • I needed a dental malpractice expert to assist me in a complex negligence claim. The very able staff at TASA had no difficulty identifying a knowledgeable professional who rendered a reasonable opinion in support of the case, which aided our client in receiving a fair amount of compensation. I am grateful to TASA for its invaluable assistance!"

    John Hermina, Hermina Law Group, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland & Washington, DC

  • For many years I have relied upon TASAmed to provide excellent medical malpractice experts. As a sole practitioner, I find it reassuring to know that a seasoned expert is just a call away. Usually, TASAmed has found just the right expert in a day or two. The support and guidance I receive from TASAmed is a vital part of my law practice, and I have come to expect both great service and high rewards from my TASA cases."

    Thomas J. Massey, The Thomas J. Massey Law Firm, Fallbrook, CA

  • The caliber of physicians that TASAmed has referred to us is superb. Prior referral groups used the same experts over and over again. With TASAmed I have access to experts all over the United States. I’m not limited to the same experts. The TASAmed staff is easy to work with and very professional, with an established track record. When I call for a medical expert, I’m called back the same day, and I often have an idea of what expert will be contacted before my first call is completed."

    Kari Alexander, Certified Legal Nurse Consultant, Texas

  • We hadn’t been able to find the medical expert we needed, and, frankly, I didn’t think we’d find one in that field. TASAmed was able to find us an expert with the exact expertise and medical experience we needed. Your referral advisor was very helpful and found our expert in one day."

    Kurt Osenbaugh, Partner, Alston & Bird, Los Angeles, CA

  • TASAmed’s service was prompt and efficient in connecting us with the right person. The expert was so cooperative and helpful. With how challenging it is to find a narrow area of medical expertise, it’s extra helpful to have your TASAmed pool to plug into instantaneously."

    Greg Roosevelt, Esq., Law Office of Greg Roosevelt, Edwardsville, IL

  • TASAmed has connected me to credible experts in four medical cases just this year. TASAmed and the referred experts respond quickly, the fees are reasonable, and the referrals are well tuned to the fields I request. Since the experts are already associated with TASAmed, they are comfortable having substantial conversations about the case, both before and after record review."

    Martin A. Cannon, Esq., Cannon Law Offices, Crescent, IA

  • I have used TASAmed a number of times and have always been happy with your give-and-take timeliness. Once I requested a medical expert in a particular field, but, after speaking with your referral advisor, we concluded that an expert in another field would be more effective. That same day, I spoke to two experts the advisor gave me, and I retained one."

    Mark A. Lope, Esq., Lope and Honlihan, Butler, PA

  • Very close to the time of trial, the TASAmed advisor quickly referred me to several experienced ER trauma physicians to review medical records and prepare me for cross-examination. After selecting my expert, I over-nighted records for review, and the doctor found valuable information for my client's defense. Thank you, TASAmed, for this timely, specific, valuable referral."

    Charles Morgan, Esq., Law Office of Charles L. Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, NC