Injuries and Damages from Landscape Construction Negligence and Defects: Irrigation Systems

TASA ID: 3447

A tired executive returns home in the evening from a long day at work. While walking along the pathway to the front door, he trips over a sprinkler head in the adjacent planter bed, loses his balance and falls awkwardly, breaking his neck and suffering paralysis from the neck down.

While attending a crowded outdoor festival, a family decides they want some ice cream. The sidewalk to the store is packed with people attending the outdoor event, so they decide to follow others and take a short cut across a planter area to avoid the crowd. The mother trips and falls over an irrigation remote control valve box, resulting in a broken ankle, lost work, and a long, painful rehabilitation.

A general contractor directs the landscape sub-contractor to install a temporary irrigation hi-line above grade. Over a holiday weekend, the irrigation hi-line breaks, flooding the work site and destroying the open footing trenches. The general contractor sues the landscape contractor for defective work and resultant damages exceeding 100K.

If you are a construction negligence and defect attorney, you have most likely encountered cases similar to the examples noted above. From my experience, irrigation systems and their components are the cause for many landscape construction defect cases.


Naturally, plaintiff and defendant counsel must discover how and why the accident occurred.  Passive irrigation related accidents typically involve tripping over irrigation components, especially when the system is not running.  Tripping hazards may include sprinkler heads on risers, vaults and boxes.   Operational or active accidents include broken main lines, sprinkler heads, stuck valves or improperly programmed controllers.  Operational accidents usually result in property damage while passive tripping hazards result in personal injury. In some cases, severe injury or death may result.  To determine the cause of the accident, investigation should center on one or all of the following:

  • Design, Construction or Maintenance?

    • The investigation must determine whether the accident was caused by defective or negligent design, construction or maintenance.

    • A design flaw can exist when a landscape professional is contracted to provide an irrigation design.  A licensed landscape architect is typically used for most public works projects, subdivision or commercial work, or any type of landscape project where a public jurisdictional agency and permit requirement exist.

    • Design-related deficiencies can be determined by inspecting landscape/irrigation development drawings, working drawings, permitted landscape plans, specifications, details, soil reports and other construction documents.

    • Construction defects usually relate to the irrigation contractor who installed the work. However, what may appear to be an obvious irrigation construction issue might relate to inaccurate or incorrect irrigation design or might be the result of poor maintenance practices.

    • Construction defects will center on field investigation and testing, inspection of contract documents, plans, and specifications, field inspection and daily reports, third party and agency correspondence.

    •  Other parties or improper maintenance may have caused what might appear to be a construction defect.

    • Irrigation maintenance can be an overlooked cause of irrigation accidents. Irrigation systems provide water, which in turn causes plant growth. Over time, plant and root development affect the surrounding grade, flatwork, masonry and other site features. Roots cause pavement to lift and break irrigation pipes. Originally installed valve boxes may rise out of grade, creating a tripping hazard. Sprinkler head spray pattern may become blocked by plant growth, causing localized flooding, erosion and other safety-related issues.

    • Irrigation components have mechanical, hydraulic and increasingly sophisticated digital and computerized components. As with any machine or mechanical system, maintenance is required. Without regular recurring maintenance inspections and testing, accidents are unavoidable.

    • It can be a very difficult and complex situation to unravel the causes and assess fault over time due to the nature of constantly changing and evolving landscape systems. It is not uncommon for a combination of causes including design, contracting and maintenance to result in an accident.

Investigating irrigation accidents inevitably leads to questions concerning the proper expectation of standard of care for irrigation design, construction and maintenance.  This is where the lines blur and standard of care becomes difficult to assess because of varying degrees of irrigation sophistication.

Construction projects managed by municipal, state, and federal agencies, large commercial and sub-division projects possess the most stringent standard of care.  Landscape construction contract documents include plans, details, specifications, schedules and related documents.  The landscape contractor awarded a public works contract is usually pre-qualified and meets experience and insurance requirements.  Details and specifications are of the highest order, and protecting public safety is a high priority.

In contrast is residential landscape construction, where a layperson (homeowner) manages the project.  There is minimal, if any, design process or plans, no details, specifications or other relevant documents.  The standard of care the homeowner may expect might differ from what the contractor might provide.


  • Hierarchy of Standard of Care (from most to least stringent):

    • Public works, including municipal, state and federal projects have the most stringent level of standard of care for landscape construction projects.  A landscape architect is required to process entitlements, provide conceptual, working and permitted plans, details and specifications.

    • Public agencies typically require pre-qualified licensed, insured, experienced landscape contractors for public bidding. That being said, public agencies often award contracts to the lowest bidder, which sometimes might be the contractor who forgot something in his/her bid.

    • Commercial, sub-division, industrial and recreational facilities, multi family housing and large, non-governmental projects usually have a landscape professional, such as a landscape architect, involved in the design process. These types of projects typically have a high level of care because the project is exposed to and used by the public. The work is usually permitted and therefore inspected by a third party for compliance issues.

    • Complicating matters, a subdivision developer may employ one set of specifications for a public improvement within the subdivision, such as a tot lot or park, while employing less stringent specifications for individual residential front yard irrigation systems. 

    • Residential landscape and irrigation construction comprise the least stringent standard of care. This is a highly regrettable situation because the homeowner, as a layperson, requires the greatest protection from unscrupulous contractors. Without having professional assistance, the homeowner is left to rely on the contractor or even worse, unlicensed gardeners and handymen. The homeowner might expect a certain standard of care the contractor cannot deliver.

    • Typically, the landscape contractor also acts as the landscape designer, often resulting in conflict of interest between design and contracting issues the homeowner might not be aware of until it is too late.

    • Safety issues are typically not the focus for residential landscape. This leads to the use of cheaper, more hazard-prone components, such as a shrub head on a riser next to a sidewalk rather than using a more expensive pop-up head.

    • There is rarely any kind of third party review or inspection.

Additional layers of complexity arise when the accident involves a general contractor-landscape subcontractor conflict.  In this scenario, an irrigation defect, be it design or construction, may have been caused by incorrect supervision by the general contractor or even a directive by a governing agency to the landscape contractor.  The reverse situation can occur whereby a negligent landscape subcontractor creates a hazard resulting in extensive damage to the general contractor's work.

Design-build projects are another form of contracting that have the potential for conflict of interest and diminished standard of care.  Landscape architects are licensed for design; landscape contractors are licensed to construct.  When a contractor is hired to both design and construct, abuses can occur.  Many qualified landscape design-build contractors have licensed landscape architects on their staff, which helps avoid conflict problems.  Design-build contractors are best utilized by savvy professionals who already understand the construction process and can benefit from the synergy of these kinds of firms.


Irrigation defects may arise from a single issue or a combination of design, construction or maintenance defects.  The defect may in some way lead to an accident, either through an operational problem or passive hazard.  The following discusses commonly encountered issues.

  • Common design, construction and maintenance defects

    • Design

      • Failure to segregate irrigation valves based on sun-shade orientation and or plant type
      • Lacking proper backflow prevention system design or incorrect components

      • Over-stretching a valve system leading to unbalanced precipitation rate, drought and or flooding

      • Using spray or rotor heads on risers instead of pop-up heads adjacent to sidewalks, curbs, decking, trails or  pathways

      • Incorrect location of controller boxes or RP backflow devices impeding traffic sight distance and sight line corridors

      • Lack of master control, isolation or control valves to turn off the irrigation main line in an emergency

      • Failure to design or specify thrust block for mainline protection

      • Failure to account for low head drainage

    • Construction

      • Failure to adhere to the irrigation design, plans, details and specifications

      • Contractors and unlicensed gardeners designing irrigation systems without knowledge of hydraulic flows or public safety issues

      • General contractors acting as design or professional consultants in making construction decisions

      • Landscape contractors performing non-contract work without written authorization

      • Landscape contractors inadvertently or otherwise acting as landscape architects or professional consultants, making decisions outside of their field of expertise

      • Contractor cutting corners using cheaper components such as heads on risers rather than pop-up heads

      •  Incorrect Reduced Pressure (RP) back flow protection or no protection at all

      • Incorrect trenching and backflow, using contaminated or rock-infested backfill, failure to properly bed pipe in a trench

      • Incorrect solvent welds, wrong or missing primer and applicable PVC glue

      • Failure to properly regulate the pressure in a system

      • Temporary hi-line irrigation mainlines improperly supported on grade, failure to bracket and or sand bag

      • Failure to install thrust blocks at angles and changes in elevation

      • Setting valve boxes and subterranean vaults at incorrect finish grade

      • Setting irrigation pop-up and heads-on risers at incorrect elevation or finish grade

      • Failure to install check or swing valves to reduce low head drainage

    • Maintenance

      • Failure to properly inspect, clean and adjust sprinkler heads

      • Failure to inspect and regularly adjust and program the irrigation controller

      • Failure to adjust irrigation heads blocked by growing plants

      • Failure to adjust valve boxes and subterranean vaults as grade changes occur

      • Incorrectly staking irrigation heads creating tripping hazard

      • Overwatering turf and planter areas leading to erosion and runoff, creating slipping hazards for pedestrians and vehicular hazards for motorists

The items listed above represent only the most common irrigation defects.  A leaking irrigation head or valve system may go unnoticed for years until one day, a motorist loses control of his/her vehicle or pedestrian slips and injures him or herself; and then there is a resultant lawsuit.

Whether counsel for a defendant or plaintiff, systematic investigation into the cause of the accident is required. This investigation should include analysis of the design, construction and maintenance aspects.  Determining the standard of care requires analysis of the level of construction management and sophistication, and whether the project is governmental, public works, commercial, sub-division or residential. The standard of care may vary accordingly. 

In order to properly distill the facts from assumptions, use an experienced, educated, knowledgeable landscape professional for investigative forensic work.

Previous Lessons from a Landscape Architect: De facto vs. De jur
Next Practical Market and Technical Research for IP Litigation and Investigations
Tasa ID3447


Let Us Find Your Expert 

Note: This form is to be completed by legal and insurance professionals ONLY. If you are a party in a case that requires an expert witness, please have your attorney contact TASA at 800-523-2319.


Search Experts

TASA provides a variety of quality, independent experts who meet your case criteria. Search our extensive list of experts now.

Search Experts


  • I think it's always good to have access to experts when [TASA] make[s] the process so easy."

    Scott McIntosh, Lewis McIntosh & Teare, Royersford, PA

  • As a busy practitioner, managing a sizeable caseload, I can use all of the help available to me. If I can outsource a task, particularly one as important as securing a qualified expert, I will jump at the opportunity. I use TASA in nearly every case where I need to find an expert witness, be it an engineer, an architect, an economist, etc. They have thousands of qualified experts to refer in virtually any field. Best of all the process is extremely simple. When I need an expert I simply contact TASA, whose knowledgeable representatives ask you targeted questions about your case, your legal theories, and your goals, in order to find the right expert for your case. I usually receive CVs and calls from the potential expert within hours. If you find the originally selected person is not a good fit – for whatever reason – TASA will work with you to find the right person. I would happily recommend this service to any attorney."

    Patrick K. Gibson, Gibson & Perkins PC, Media, PA

  • Ms. Darlie I. McDonald RN was awesome on the witness stand, and we prevailed in our case to the tune of  [a] (highly unusual [amount] for a medical malpractice [case] in our area).  I'd highly recommend her."

    Shane Reed, Shane A. Reed Law Office, Jacksonville, OR

  • I appreciate your inquiries and offers of assistance as well as the consistently high-quality, well-organized, and erudite TASA webinars, which invariably have excellent presenters."

    Maurice S. Kane, Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates PC, Riverside, CA

  • Steven Kursh was an outstanding technical expert on our ecommerce IP lawsuit. He completed a massive amount of work on extremely complicated material, in a very short period of time. His work product was first rate and I think he would have done a terrific job if the case proceeded to trial. He is very articulate and helped us. I only wish we had gotten him involved sooner in the litigation."

    Daniel J. Brown, Reiss Sheppe LLP, New York, NY

  • I thank you all for the response to my request for an expert witness...Both Mr. Scott and Mr. Bianchi appear to be well-qualified for this case, but we have hired another expert. As always, I was impressed by TASA's ability to produce exceptionally well-qualified candidates with great speed."

    John Thomas Dzialo, The Law Offices of John Thomas Dzialo, Santa Ana, CA

  • Thank you for your quick response and the names of the two proposed experts. The situation that gave rise to our search for these experts has resolved and we will not need to retain them. However, we will continue to keep TASA in mind as these needs arise from time to time as your breadth of coverage for experts of all types is unparalleled, in my experience."

    Bart W. Brizzee, County of San Bernadino, San Bernadino, CA

  • I have used TASA for the last five years for locating an expert for many personal injury cases. On each and every occasion, TASA was able to find me more than one qualified expert. With such a variety of experts, I was able to select one who met my client's needs in prosecuting these claims. I found the experts TASA referred not only qualified, but available on a moment's notice. Your fees are reasonable and fair, and I will continue to use TASA for the remainder of my career."

    Robert Oushalem, Esq., The Law Office of Robert Oushalem, San Jose, CA

  • I recently used TASA for the first time to locate an expert to testify in a case requiring rather unusual expertise and where there were no applicable regulations or standards for guidance. TASA referred an expert in California who was everything a lawyer looks for in a forensic expert. He was promptly available for consultation, efficiently prepared for deposition and trial and very persuasive and credible with the jury. TASA's administrative services and assistance in locating this expert were excellent, and we would certainly use both the expert and TASA in the future."

    Theodore Phillips, Miller Hauser Law Group, LLP, Placerville, CA

  • TASA has always given me first-class service, but in a recent matter, TASA found the 'needle-in-the-haystack' expert witness we feared didn't exist. We needed an expert for a very narrow and limited issue in a very narrow and limited industry. Because TASA has an extensive expert witness database, it was able to give us a referral almost on the spot. It's why I always turn to TASA first."

    Kathleen A. Herdell, Law Offices of Kathleen A. Herdell, St. Helena, CA

  • There are numerous companies that provide litigation experts. However, I always choose the TASA Group because of their quick response in finding a qualified expert for my particular case. I have extreme confidence in the TASA Group and will continue to use their services in the future."

    Katie A. Killion, Esq., Chiurazzi & Mengine, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA

  • I spent hours trying to locate an expert in a very technical case involving a defect in a medical device. I could have saved a lot of time by calling TASA first. Within hours, I was supplied with the name of an engineer who had more than 30 years of job training, education and expertise in the precise area involving the device. Bravo TASA!"

    Timothy W. Peach, Partner, Peach & Weathers, San Bernardino, CA

  • We were involved in a case pending for more than five years with seven parties from three states. Three mediations failed before we looked to TASA for an expert. TASA referred an expert who clearly understood the complexity of the project and could effectively support his opinion. If it weren't for his expert advice and deposition testimony, the case would not have settled. Interestingly, the case settled within 90 days from the date this expert began."

    Renee Colbert, Esq., Corporate Counsel, W.G. Tomko, Inc., Finleyville, PA

  • Using TASA to find experts for defending our client in a negligent homicide case ended up being one of the most important decisions we made in trial preparation. The experts they suggested were exactly what we needed for the case. I truly did not expect to find experts that would be such a perfect fit for the nature of case. TASA provided us with highly qualified experts in somewhat narrow fields of expertise. A large percentage of our victory is due to the experts recommended by TASA."

    Marta Farmer, Esq., Carl S. White Law Office, Haver, MT

  • I have used TASA's services since the 1980's and have never been disappointed. TASA is indispensable for locating that hard-to-find expert. TASA representatives have always been courteous and pleasant, with the attitude that they cannot do enough to help. I expect to continue using TASA throughout my career."

    Brad W. Greenberg, Esq., Smyth Law Offices, P.C., Brockton, MA

  • I needed to retain a multitude of scientists from a variety of disciplines for a complex litigation. Initially, I went through a series of interviews with an extremely knowledgeable and professional team of TASA advisors. They were able to find highly qualified experts in the specific fields, all of whom turned out to be superior in qualification and area of expertise to my adversary’s experts. I am a TASA believer!"

    Nooshin Namazi, Partner, Nicoletti Hornig & Sweeney, New York, NY

  • TASA always comes through in the difficult IP cases. Their representatives work with you to refine the search criteria and quickly send you a list of very qualified experts."

    Timothy L. Boller, Principal, Seed Intellectual Property Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA

  • Special thanks to our TASA referral advisor for her quick response to our initial request—we were extremely happy with how fast TASA was able to assist us! Your group does excellent work, and it is always my first stop when looking for an expert."

    Susanne K. Sullivan, Senior Attorney, Southwest Airlines Corporation, Dallas, TX

  • When we needed an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit, we turned to TASA. We were looking for a witness qualified in two unrelated technical areas, and TASA worked with us to identify and refine our requirements. TASA performed well, promptly providing us with several excellent candidates to consider, one of whom we retained."

    Joseph T. Miotke, Partner, IP Practice Group, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI

  • Our team had a very positive experience with TASA. The Expert was professional, efficient, and certainly an expert in his field. His work and testimony contributed to a winning decision for our client! We will recommend the Expert and TASA whenever appropriate."

    Stephanie Sprague, Esq., CT

  • (The Expert) WAS A PERFECT FIT for my case: qualified, competent, easy to work with, attentive to detail, knowledgeable, smart, communicative, enthusiastic, resourceful—have I left anything out? I highly recommend TASA and would be happy to share my experience with anyone else. Thank you!"

    Michael Porrazzo, Esq., The Porrazzo Law Firm, Mission Viejo, CA

  • The expert was very thorough. TASA was quick to respond with an answer to my request. I have used TASA in the past under various other law firms and have been pleased. TASA continues to live up to expectations and then some."

    Anne Desormier-Cartwright, Esq., Jupiter, FL

  • Your organization found us an appropriate expert witness in less than one day. This was excellent service. The expert you found was excellent and a pleasure to work with."

    William A. Ehrlich, Esq., Allentown, PA

  • (The Expert)…accomplished exactly what we wanted. TASA was very prompt and efficient in locating him. All fees were reasonable."

    J. Michael Lehman, Esq., Bruce, Bruce, & Lehman, Wichita, KS

  • We needed an Internet expert right away to meet a deadline. One phone call to TASA, and in less than a day, TASA called back with a list of 8-10 experts who were exactly what I needed. The TASA expert I chose knew the business and mechanics of the Internet so well—he was a PhD and professor who had written a book on the subject—that he put the fear of truth in the defendant that caused him to settle. When I get the kind of service that I did from TASA, I stick with it and use it again and again."

    Philip Green, Attorney at Law, Green and Green, San Rafael and San Francisco, CA

  • Excellent—in a word. I just do not have the time to hunt for experts. (The Expert) was fantastic. Thank you for providing such a quality service."

    Francesca Carinci, Esq., Steubenville, OH

  • TASA stands for Tops At Serving Attorneys. It’s always rewarding working with TASA."

    Marshall A. Bernstein, Esq., Philadelphia, PA.

  • That was, however, one of the best and most interesting webinars I've seen in the last few years.  Thank you for hosting it and introducing me to such a knowledgeable and caring person." - Referencing the Medicolegal Consequences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Civilian and Military Populations webinar. 

    Lori Bauer Apodaca, The Law Office of Lori Bauer Apodaca, Los Lunas, NM 

  • I needed a dental malpractice expert to assist me in a complex negligence claim. The very able staff at TASA had no difficulty identifying a knowledgeable professional who rendered a reasonable opinion in support of the case, which aided our client in receiving a fair amount of compensation. I am grateful to TASA for its invaluable assistance!"

    John Hermina, Hermina Law Group, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland & Washington, DC

  • For many years I have relied upon TASAmed to provide excellent medical malpractice experts. As a sole practitioner, I find it reassuring to know that a seasoned expert is just a call away. Usually, TASAmed has found just the right expert in a day or two. The support and guidance I receive from TASAmed is a vital part of my law practice, and I have come to expect both great service and high rewards from my TASA cases."

    Thomas J. Massey, The Thomas J. Massey Law Firm, Fallbrook, CA

  • The caliber of physicians that TASAmed has referred to us is superb. Prior referral groups used the same experts over and over again. With TASAmed I have access to experts all over the United States. I’m not limited to the same experts. The TASAmed staff is easy to work with and very professional, with an established track record. When I call for a medical expert, I’m called back the same day, and I often have an idea of what expert will be contacted before my first call is completed."

    Kari Alexander, Certified Legal Nurse Consultant, Texas

  • We hadn’t been able to find the medical expert we needed, and, frankly, I didn’t think we’d find one in that field. TASAmed was able to find us an expert with the exact expertise and medical experience we needed. Your referral advisor was very helpful and found our expert in one day."

    Kurt Osenbaugh, Partner, Alston & Bird, Los Angeles, CA

  • TASAmed’s service was prompt and efficient in connecting us with the right person. The expert was so cooperative and helpful. With how challenging it is to find a narrow area of medical expertise, it’s extra helpful to have your TASAmed pool to plug into instantaneously."

    Greg Roosevelt, Esq., Law Office of Greg Roosevelt, Edwardsville, IL

  • TASAmed has connected me to credible experts in four medical cases just this year. TASAmed and the referred experts respond quickly, the fees are reasonable, and the referrals are well tuned to the fields I request. Since the experts are already associated with TASAmed, they are comfortable having substantial conversations about the case, both before and after record review."

    Martin A. Cannon, Esq., Cannon Law Offices, Crescent, IA

  • I have used TASAmed a number of times and have always been happy with your give-and-take timeliness. Once I requested a medical expert in a particular field, but, after speaking with your referral advisor, we concluded that an expert in another field would be more effective. That same day, I spoke to two experts the advisor gave me, and I retained one."

    Mark A. Lope, Esq., Lope and Honlihan, Butler, PA

  • Very close to the time of trial, the TASAmed advisor quickly referred me to several experienced ER trauma physicians to review medical records and prepare me for cross-examination. After selecting my expert, I over-nighted records for review, and the doctor found valuable information for my client's defense. Thank you, TASAmed, for this timely, specific, valuable referral."

    Charles Morgan, Esq., Law Office of Charles L. Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, NC