CAFE Rules, Lightweight Vehicles & Questions of Safety

TASA ID: 3190

Recently adopted fuel efficiency rules in the USA require that passenger vehicles must achieve an average of 54.5 miles per gallon by the year 2025. This “average” is further detailed into different goals for different sizes and class of vehicles and does not mean that all automobiles have to achieve the average 54.5 mpg. However, it still represents a big jump from today’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) numbers, especially because the phased march towards this goal must begin with the 2017 vehicles. This significant challenge for the automakers has led to the study of many technologies for increasing automobiles’ fuel efficiency, and one of the promising ones is that of reducing a vehicle’s mass while maintaining its usable space. Such mass reduction will require that vehicle designs be optimized for efficiency and that they use more “alternate materials” such as aluminum, magnesium and ultra-high strength steel.

This outlook of future vehicles being of relatively lighter mass raises several questions, including the often-repeated one – Will such mass reduction lead to reduced safety of the occupants in crashes? This question also applies to current fleet because the passenger vehicles on the road today range widely in size and mass, from the smallest mini-compact to full-size SUVs and pickup trucks. In addition, automakers are continuously reducing their vehicle’s mass with each design cycle. The question as applied to current vehicles then becomes – Are lighter vehicles less safe than heavier vehicles?

One prevailing opinion regarding the effect of mass reduction on the safety of vehicle’s occupants holds that a reduced-mass vehicle will provide less safety for its occupants in crashes. The example cited to support this opinion is that of a crash between two vehicles of unequal mass (but; otherwise, identical) along with the statement that occupants in lighter vehicles will likely have more injuries than those in the heavier ones. However, the reality is that actual crashes cover a wide range in terms of their severity, crash mode, struck objects, safety system use, occupant size, etc.  When this complexity is taken into account, the effect of mass reduction on automotive safety becomes more difficult to project and a realistic estimate of future vehicle safety requires that all the relevant and important factors be taken into account. Some of these factors that must be considered in comparing present- to future-vehicles are (a) the ability of the vehicle to avoid a crash, (b) the parameters of the crash (severity, direction, struck object, etc.), and (c) the vehicle’s design for occupant protection (structure, restraint systems, etc.).

In order to obtain such realistic estimates of mass-reduction effect, several well-planned studies have involved the design of reduced-mass vehicles by using computer-aided-engineering (CAE), followed by the evaluation of the crash performance of these virtual vehicles in several simulated crashes. Since it is possible to achieve varying levels of mass reduction by proper choice of the amounts of the alternate materials, a meaningful comparison between a current vehicle and its mass-reduced future version requires that some criterion be imposed to restrict the amount of alternate materials. The criterion used in the two undermentioned studies is that these near-future vehicles should remain “affordable.” These studies were sponsored by (a) the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and (b) the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and underwent peer reviews (I served as one of the peer reviewers). The full report of the NHTSA study is available from the Department of Transportation as are the reviews. The EPA-sponsored study and its peer reviews are not yet published but a summary is available as a technical paper.[iii]

Both of the aforementioned studies utilized finite element analysis (FEA) methodology to develop highly-detailed designs of passenger vehicles that meet the constraints of cost and size.  The NHTSA study used a 2010 midsize passenger car as “base” and redesigned it to achieve the specified reduction in mass. The report showed the feasibility of 22% reduction in vehicle mass within the constraint of 10% increase in direct manufacturing cost. This study concluded that the reduced-mass vehicle would be able to maintain the same safety ratings in NHTSA and IIHS crash tests as the current (2010) model if safety-relevant components, e.g., airbags, sensors, seatbelts are properly designed as an integrated system with the rest of the vehicle.

The EPA-sponsored study applied similar technique to the redesign of a full-size pickup truck for the 2020-2025 timeframe. The future design was required to maintain the current level of safety and truck-relevant functionalities, e.g., closure performance, durability, vehicle handling, as well as meet the cost constraints. The study showed that such lightweight designs are feasible with various levels of mass reduction achieved by using alternate materials to different degrees. It was demonstrated that mass reductions of up to 9% are possible without any cost increase while greater reductions in mass can be achieved at higher costs, e.g., 511 kg reduction in mass at cost increase of $2,228.00 or $4.36/kg) while maintaining safety and performance.

Other researchers have also concluded that “lighter mass” doesn’t mean “less safe.” A statistical analysis of accident data found that the estimated effects of passenger car weight reduction “on fatalities per accident are small (not statistically significant) or to decrease fatalities.” The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review (volume 41, no.3, 2008) similarly called it a myth that “lighter cars are less safe than heavier vehicles” and stated that “new materials can make cars lighter and as safe as heavier vehicles.”

Of course, any estimation of future trends is subject to and limited by the assumptions made in that study. One of such assumptions usually made in the estimating the safety of automobiles is that this parameter is represented by the vehicle’s performance in the high-speed crash tests conducted by NHTSA and IIHS. However, detailed examinations of US crash statistics show that most crashes and injuries happen at speeds far lower than the speed in the aforementioned tests. Recent NHTSA-sponsored research has tried to address this by creating “fleet based models” of vehicle safety. This research proposed statistical estimation of the safety of future designs by using CAE simulations (as stated above) combined with statistical approximations. But this research is in its infancy, needing much more work before these concepts can be considered practical (I was a peer reviewer for this research as well).

Additionally, the term “vehicle safety” may mean different things to different segments of society, ranging from total societal harm (total number of injuries and fatalities nationally per year), to a driver’s definition of personal safety, to the socially important safety of pedestrians (concentrated among young children and older adults). Another point to consider is that the long-term effects of the environment on our health and longevity are becoming better understood and quantified. Since automobile tailpipe emissions are a significant component of air quality, it is logical to ask if the effects of an automobile’s emissions should be included in the evaluation of its overall safety. Such additions of immediately perceptible variables (speed, direction, structure, airbags, post-crash rescue, etc.) to the longer-term variables (environmental effect on health) may lead to different conclusions regarding safety of future designs.

The actual assessment of any vehicle’s safety can only be made after such vehicles have been in use for a number of years and after large amounts of accident data have been collected. Although such data for 2017-2025 vehicles will not be available for many years, the research shows that “reduced mass vehicles” do not necessarily equate to “less safe vehicles” and that technologies exist to achieve high levels of occupants’ safety for all sizes and types of passenger vehicles. Of course, when evaluating a vehicle’s safety in a specific event, it is necessary to only consider the specifics of that vehicle’s design and of the performance of its components under the given operating (or accident) parameters.


This article discusses issues of general interest and does not give any specific legal or business advice pertaining to any specific circumstances.  Before acting upon any of its information, you should obtain appropriate advice from a lawyer or other qualified professional.

This article may not be duplicated, altered, distributed, saved, incorporated into another document or website, or otherwise modified without the permission of TASA.

“Agency Sponsored Mass Reduction Studies” by Bolon and Zhao, SAE 2015.

“Peer Review for Mass Reduction for Light Duty Vehicles for Model years 2017-2025, US Department of Transportation, July 26, 2012.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Lightweight Design for 2020-2025: An Assessment of a Light-Duty Pickup Truck” by Caffrey et al, SAE 2015-01-0559.

“Updated Effects of the Analysis of Passenger Vehicle Weight and Size on Safety,” Report DRI-TR-13-04, May 2013, Dynamic Research Inc.

“Preliminary Evaluation of Pre-crash Safety System Effectiveness,” by Verma & Goertz, SAE paper 2010-01-1042.

“Methodology for Evaluating Fleet Protection of New Vehicle Designs,” Report DOT HS 812 051, August 2014.

“Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States,” by Tessum et al., Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, December 2014.

Previous Deficiencies Found in Many Marine Stairways and Ladders Resulting in Accidents
Next Event Data Recorders (EDR) and the importance of evaluating the data with the available physical evidence
Tasa ID3190


Let Us Find Your Expert 

Note: This form is to be completed by legal and insurance professionals ONLY. If you are a party in a case that requires an expert witness, please have your attorney contact TASA at 800-523-2319.


Search Experts

TASA provides a variety of quality, independent experts who meet your case criteria. Search our extensive list of experts now.

Search Experts


  • I think it's always good to have access to experts when [TASA] make[s] the process so easy."

    Scott McIntosh, Lewis McIntosh & Teare, Royersford, PA

  • As a busy practitioner, managing a sizeable caseload, I can use all of the help available to me. If I can outsource a task, particularly one as important as securing a qualified expert, I will jump at the opportunity. I use TASA in nearly every case where I need to find an expert witness, be it an engineer, an architect, an economist, etc. They have thousands of qualified experts to refer in virtually any field. Best of all the process is extremely simple. When I need an expert I simply contact TASA, whose knowledgeable representatives ask you targeted questions about your case, your legal theories, and your goals, in order to find the right expert for your case. I usually receive CVs and calls from the potential expert within hours. If you find the originally selected person is not a good fit – for whatever reason – TASA will work with you to find the right person. I would happily recommend this service to any attorney."

    Patrick K. Gibson, Gibson & Perkins PC, Media, PA

  • Ms. Darlie I. McDonald RN was awesome on the witness stand, and we prevailed in our case to the tune of  [a] (highly unusual [amount] for a medical malpractice [case] in our area).  I'd highly recommend her."

    Shane Reed, Shane A. Reed Law Office, Jacksonville, OR

  • I appreciate your inquiries and offers of assistance as well as the consistently high-quality, well-organized, and erudite TASA webinars, which invariably have excellent presenters."

    Maurice S. Kane, Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates PC, Riverside, CA

  • Steven Kursh was an outstanding technical expert on our ecommerce IP lawsuit. He completed a massive amount of work on extremely complicated material, in a very short period of time. His work product was first rate and I think he would have done a terrific job if the case proceeded to trial. He is very articulate and helped us. I only wish we had gotten him involved sooner in the litigation."

    Daniel J. Brown, Reiss Sheppe LLP, New York, NY

  • I thank you all for the response to my request for an expert witness...Both Mr. Scott and Mr. Bianchi appear to be well-qualified for this case, but we have hired another expert. As always, I was impressed by TASA's ability to produce exceptionally well-qualified candidates with great speed."

    John Thomas Dzialo, The Law Offices of John Thomas Dzialo, Santa Ana, CA

  • Thank you for your quick response and the names of the two proposed experts. The situation that gave rise to our search for these experts has resolved and we will not need to retain them. However, we will continue to keep TASA in mind as these needs arise from time to time as your breadth of coverage for experts of all types is unparalleled, in my experience."

    Bart W. Brizzee, County of San Bernadino, San Bernadino, CA

  • I have used TASA for the last five years for locating an expert for many personal injury cases. On each and every occasion, TASA was able to find me more than one qualified expert. With such a variety of experts, I was able to select one who met my client's needs in prosecuting these claims. I found the experts TASA referred not only qualified, but available on a moment's notice. Your fees are reasonable and fair, and I will continue to use TASA for the remainder of my career."

    Robert Oushalem, Esq., The Law Office of Robert Oushalem, San Jose, CA

  • I recently used TASA for the first time to locate an expert to testify in a case requiring rather unusual expertise and where there were no applicable regulations or standards for guidance. TASA referred an expert in California who was everything a lawyer looks for in a forensic expert. He was promptly available for consultation, efficiently prepared for deposition and trial and very persuasive and credible with the jury. TASA's administrative services and assistance in locating this expert were excellent, and we would certainly use both the expert and TASA in the future."

    Theodore Phillips, Miller Hauser Law Group, LLP, Placerville, CA

  • TASA has always given me first-class service, but in a recent matter, TASA found the 'needle-in-the-haystack' expert witness we feared didn't exist. We needed an expert for a very narrow and limited issue in a very narrow and limited industry. Because TASA has an extensive expert witness database, it was able to give us a referral almost on the spot. It's why I always turn to TASA first."

    Kathleen A. Herdell, Law Offices of Kathleen A. Herdell, St. Helena, CA

  • There are numerous companies that provide litigation experts. However, I always choose the TASA Group because of their quick response in finding a qualified expert for my particular case. I have extreme confidence in the TASA Group and will continue to use their services in the future."

    Katie A. Killion, Esq., Chiurazzi & Mengine, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA

  • I spent hours trying to locate an expert in a very technical case involving a defect in a medical device. I could have saved a lot of time by calling TASA first. Within hours, I was supplied with the name of an engineer who had more than 30 years of job training, education and expertise in the precise area involving the device. Bravo TASA!"

    Timothy W. Peach, Partner, Peach & Weathers, San Bernardino, CA

  • We were involved in a case pending for more than five years with seven parties from three states. Three mediations failed before we looked to TASA for an expert. TASA referred an expert who clearly understood the complexity of the project and could effectively support his opinion. If it weren't for his expert advice and deposition testimony, the case would not have settled. Interestingly, the case settled within 90 days from the date this expert began."

    Renee Colbert, Esq., Corporate Counsel, W.G. Tomko, Inc., Finleyville, PA

  • Using TASA to find experts for defending our client in a negligent homicide case ended up being one of the most important decisions we made in trial preparation. The experts they suggested were exactly what we needed for the case. I truly did not expect to find experts that would be such a perfect fit for the nature of case. TASA provided us with highly qualified experts in somewhat narrow fields of expertise. A large percentage of our victory is due to the experts recommended by TASA."

    Marta Farmer, Esq., Carl S. White Law Office, Haver, MT

  • I have used TASA's services since the 1980's and have never been disappointed. TASA is indispensable for locating that hard-to-find expert. TASA representatives have always been courteous and pleasant, with the attitude that they cannot do enough to help. I expect to continue using TASA throughout my career."

    Brad W. Greenberg, Esq., Smyth Law Offices, P.C., Brockton, MA

  • I needed to retain a multitude of scientists from a variety of disciplines for a complex litigation. Initially, I went through a series of interviews with an extremely knowledgeable and professional team of TASA advisors. They were able to find highly qualified experts in the specific fields, all of whom turned out to be superior in qualification and area of expertise to my adversary’s experts. I am a TASA believer!"

    Nooshin Namazi, Partner, Nicoletti Hornig & Sweeney, New York, NY

  • TASA always comes through in the difficult IP cases. Their representatives work with you to refine the search criteria and quickly send you a list of very qualified experts."

    Timothy L. Boller, Principal, Seed Intellectual Property Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA

  • Special thanks to our TASA referral advisor for her quick response to our initial request—we were extremely happy with how fast TASA was able to assist us! Your group does excellent work, and it is always my first stop when looking for an expert."

    Susanne K. Sullivan, Senior Attorney, Southwest Airlines Corporation, Dallas, TX

  • When we needed an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit, we turned to TASA. We were looking for a witness qualified in two unrelated technical areas, and TASA worked with us to identify and refine our requirements. TASA performed well, promptly providing us with several excellent candidates to consider, one of whom we retained."

    Joseph T. Miotke, Partner, IP Practice Group, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI

  • Our team had a very positive experience with TASA. The Expert was professional, efficient, and certainly an expert in his field. His work and testimony contributed to a winning decision for our client! We will recommend the Expert and TASA whenever appropriate."

    Stephanie Sprague, Esq., CT

  • (The Expert) WAS A PERFECT FIT for my case: qualified, competent, easy to work with, attentive to detail, knowledgeable, smart, communicative, enthusiastic, resourceful—have I left anything out? I highly recommend TASA and would be happy to share my experience with anyone else. Thank you!"

    Michael Porrazzo, Esq., The Porrazzo Law Firm, Mission Viejo, CA

  • The expert was very thorough. TASA was quick to respond with an answer to my request. I have used TASA in the past under various other law firms and have been pleased. TASA continues to live up to expectations and then some."

    Anne Desormier-Cartwright, Esq., Jupiter, FL

  • Your organization found us an appropriate expert witness in less than one day. This was excellent service. The expert you found was excellent and a pleasure to work with."

    William A. Ehrlich, Esq., Allentown, PA

  • (The Expert)…accomplished exactly what we wanted. TASA was very prompt and efficient in locating him. All fees were reasonable."

    J. Michael Lehman, Esq., Bruce, Bruce, & Lehman, Wichita, KS

  • We needed an Internet expert right away to meet a deadline. One phone call to TASA, and in less than a day, TASA called back with a list of 8-10 experts who were exactly what I needed. The TASA expert I chose knew the business and mechanics of the Internet so well—he was a PhD and professor who had written a book on the subject—that he put the fear of truth in the defendant that caused him to settle. When I get the kind of service that I did from TASA, I stick with it and use it again and again."

    Philip Green, Attorney at Law, Green and Green, San Rafael and San Francisco, CA

  • Excellent—in a word. I just do not have the time to hunt for experts. (The Expert) was fantastic. Thank you for providing such a quality service."

    Francesca Carinci, Esq., Steubenville, OH

  • TASA stands for Tops At Serving Attorneys. It’s always rewarding working with TASA."

    Marshall A. Bernstein, Esq., Philadelphia, PA.

  • That was, however, one of the best and most interesting webinars I've seen in the last few years.  Thank you for hosting it and introducing me to such a knowledgeable and caring person." - Referencing the Medicolegal Consequences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Civilian and Military Populations webinar. 

    Lori Bauer Apodaca, The Law Office of Lori Bauer Apodaca, Los Lunas, NM 

  • I needed a dental malpractice expert to assist me in a complex negligence claim. The very able staff at TASA had no difficulty identifying a knowledgeable professional who rendered a reasonable opinion in support of the case, which aided our client in receiving a fair amount of compensation. I am grateful to TASA for its invaluable assistance!"

    John Hermina, Hermina Law Group, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland & Washington, DC

  • For many years I have relied upon TASAmed to provide excellent medical malpractice experts. As a sole practitioner, I find it reassuring to know that a seasoned expert is just a call away. Usually, TASAmed has found just the right expert in a day or two. The support and guidance I receive from TASAmed is a vital part of my law practice, and I have come to expect both great service and high rewards from my TASA cases."

    Thomas J. Massey, The Thomas J. Massey Law Firm, Fallbrook, CA

  • The caliber of physicians that TASAmed has referred to us is superb. Prior referral groups used the same experts over and over again. With TASAmed I have access to experts all over the United States. I’m not limited to the same experts. The TASAmed staff is easy to work with and very professional, with an established track record. When I call for a medical expert, I’m called back the same day, and I often have an idea of what expert will be contacted before my first call is completed."

    Kari Alexander, Certified Legal Nurse Consultant, Texas

  • We hadn’t been able to find the medical expert we needed, and, frankly, I didn’t think we’d find one in that field. TASAmed was able to find us an expert with the exact expertise and medical experience we needed. Your referral advisor was very helpful and found our expert in one day."

    Kurt Osenbaugh, Partner, Alston & Bird, Los Angeles, CA

  • TASAmed’s service was prompt and efficient in connecting us with the right person. The expert was so cooperative and helpful. With how challenging it is to find a narrow area of medical expertise, it’s extra helpful to have your TASAmed pool to plug into instantaneously."

    Greg Roosevelt, Esq., Law Office of Greg Roosevelt, Edwardsville, IL

  • TASAmed has connected me to credible experts in four medical cases just this year. TASAmed and the referred experts respond quickly, the fees are reasonable, and the referrals are well tuned to the fields I request. Since the experts are already associated with TASAmed, they are comfortable having substantial conversations about the case, both before and after record review."

    Martin A. Cannon, Esq., Cannon Law Offices, Crescent, IA

  • I have used TASAmed a number of times and have always been happy with your give-and-take timeliness. Once I requested a medical expert in a particular field, but, after speaking with your referral advisor, we concluded that an expert in another field would be more effective. That same day, I spoke to two experts the advisor gave me, and I retained one."

    Mark A. Lope, Esq., Lope and Honlihan, Butler, PA

  • Very close to the time of trial, the TASAmed advisor quickly referred me to several experienced ER trauma physicians to review medical records and prepare me for cross-examination. After selecting my expert, I over-nighted records for review, and the doctor found valuable information for my client's defense. Thank you, TASAmed, for this timely, specific, valuable referral."

    Charles Morgan, Esq., Law Office of Charles L. Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, NC