Menu
0

800-523-2319experts@tasanet.com

Articles

Categories: Polygraph

Post-Conviction Sex Offender Polygraph Testing: Not the Same as Pre-Conviction Testing

TASA ID: 2996

The polygraph has gained great popularity for the purpose of treating and supervising the convicted sexual offender in the United States. Use of the polygraph for post-conviction sex offender testing (PCSOT) started in the 1970s. In the 1990s a method called the containment approach (CA) was suggested. The CA suggests that the polygraph examiner, through collaboration, can assist the therapist and probation officer in supervising and treating the sexual offender.  Promotion of the CA has resulted in the spread of the use of the polygraph with convicted sex offenders throughout most of the United States.

            The two primary types of examinations used in PCSOT are the sexual history polygraph examination (SHPE) and the maintenance polygraph. The maintenance examination is used to assess the offender's compliance with treatment and supervision over a limited period of time (usually about 6 months). The SHPE is used to gain information about the offender's lifetime history of sexual offending and other sexually deviant behaviors. It is believed that having a complete history of the offender's deviant behaviors will improve the quality of treatment delivered as well as provide information to the probation officer to manage the risk of the offender.  It is also believed that knowing the offender's prior patterns and choices of victims will give direction to the probation officer on how to best supervise the offender.  I will focus on the SHPE for this discussion as it has been more frequently studied.

            The SHPE is a process where the offender is required to fill out a lengthy questionnaire of his/her prior sexual behaviors and list all victims. Some questionnaires ask for identifying information on victims, and others request that no identifying information be given. After the offender fills out the questionnaire, it is recommended that his or her work be pre-approved by the therapist and/or probation officer. Once the therapist or probation officer determines that the offender has adequately filled out the questionnaire, the offender then undergoes a polygraph examination.

            There are several questions and concerns with this type of testing. Although it has been shown that offenders who undergo a SHPE provide more information, there has been little evidence to demonstrate that the information traditionally obtained from the SHPE is relevant to the reduction of recidivism. After all, that is the purpose of supervision and treatment, to reduce risk of reoffense, or danger to the community. However, many therapists and community corrections officials make risk management decisions based on how the offender performs on the SHPE. A case that may demonstrate the belief of the importance of the SHPE is United States v. Antelope, 395 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2005). Apparently the therapist and/or probation officer, as well as the court, believed Antelope was enough of a threat for not undergoing the SHPE that his supervision was revoked. A higher court eventually found that Antelope could not be forced to incriminate himself, and he was remanded back to the lower court.

            Similar rulings have also been found more recently (2010). In Texas, William Thomas Leonard v. The State of Texas involved an offender who was revoked for failing numerous polygraph examinations. This case was later reversed. In Arizona, a similar ruling was made where the appellate court found that Jacobsen could not be forced to waive his rights (Ryan Jacobsen, Petitioner v. The Honorable Thomas Lindberg, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona).

            Although these rulings indicate that a majority of courts may find that an offender cannot be forced to incriminate himself, there was a Supreme Court decision where it was upheld that an inmate could be required to undergo a SHPE as a treatment condition. This case was somewhat different in that the offender was not compelled to incriminate himself, as the treatment program (in prison) was voluntary (McKune v Lile, 536 U.S. 24).

            The above cases suggest that these matters are not completely settled, and that apparently some therapists and or corrections officials believe that the SHPE is an important part of treatment and supervision. Therefore, this would also suggest that there is a belief that undergoing a SHPE and passing it must reduce recidivism. However, in my research for my *dissertation, I found that passing or failing a SHPE did not significantly predict recidivism for 93 sexual offenders. (*"Predicting Recidivism of the Convicted Sexual Offender Using the Sexual History Polygraph and the Static 99"- pending publication). Similarly, factors traditionally believed important, such as paraphilias and being victimized as a child, were not predictive of recidivism.

            With the aforementioned concerns regarding the SHPE, it is evident that there are some differences between PCSOT and the traditional criminal investigative testing that has come before the courts. When testifying regarding post-conviction testing, I have found that many tend to approach the issue of post-conviction testing in the same manner as pre-conviction testing. For example, the focus is on the type of test conducted, the scoring method used, and issues of reliability and validity or accuracy. This is understandable in that many polygraph examiners do not understand the issues in PCSOT. Most polygraph examiners have an undergraduate degree and have had little advanced training in the issues of base rates and the basics of reliability and validity for testing. Some erroneously assume that information learned from pre-conviction testing holds true for post-conviction testing.

            Although the post-conviction test should hold up as a sound test based on current standards, this is just the beginning. Scoring the examination in an appropriate manner may be an initial concern, but again, it is just making sure that the basics were conducted correctly. After the PCSOT has passed the initial phase of being an examination that was conducted according to standards, then other arguments are to be made.

  • Reliability, for the polygraph has been primarily studied regarding scoring in specific incident pre-conviction testing. Assumptions from what we know with pre-conviction tests can only carry over to post-conviction testing if we are comparing similar methods, which is usually not the case.
  • Validity or accuracy is still a question that cannot be answered with any certainty with pre-conviction. Some examiners mistakenly cite the findings of the National Research Council (2003) as the level of accuracy. This is incorrect and cannot transfer over to PCSOT (with any reasonable levels of confidence) due to base rates and comparing a known event (criminal investigation) to an unknown event (PCSOT).

            Once the basics of the polygraph have been put to rest, there is an additional area that should be considered with PCSOT. With pre-conviction testing, we are trying to determine whether or not the person is guilty of the crime of which he or she is being accused. With PCSOT, we are attempting to demonstrate (using the CA) the offender's amenability to treatment, conformance to supervision, and ultimately, risk to the community. Therefore, the next consideration for the relevance of the examination performed on the offender is whether or not the questions are targeting behaviors that are appropriate to determine conformance and risk that rise to the level of the reactions of the therapist and probation officer. Many polygraph examiners do not have a thorough grasp on these issues. Similarly, there are many misunderstandings or disagreements amongst therapists regarding these issues that may also be of concern. Many of these concerns are not raised during a hearing, leaving the question of risk of the defendant to be based solely on how well he or she did on the polygraph, rather than the relevance of the polygraph. Therefore, the trier of fact should have all available information to make an informed decision as to the risk of the defendant and whether or not the risk was appropriately assessed.

This article discusses issues of general interest and does not give any specific legal or business advice pertaining to any specific circumstances.  Before acting upon any of its information, you should obtain appropriate advice from a lawyer or other qualified professional.    

This article may not be duplicated, altered, distributed, saved, incorporated into another document or website, or otherwise modified without the permission of TASA.

 Bookmark and Share
Previous Recent Fires Turn Safe Deposit Vaults Into Ovens
Next Steps To Take To Avoid Damage and Liability When Moving Your Office
Print
Tasa ID2996

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Let Us Find Your Expert 

Note: This form is to be completed by legal and insurance professionals ONLY. If you are a party in a case that requires an expert witness, please have your attorney contact TASA at 800-523-2319.

Submit

Search Experts

TASA provides a variety of quality, independent experts who meet your case criteria. Search our extensive list of experts now.

Search Experts

Testimonials

  • I think it's always good to have access to experts when [TASA] make[s] the process so easy."

    Scott McIntosh, Lewis McIntosh & Teare, Royersford, PA

  • As a busy practitioner, managing a sizeable caseload, I can use all of the help available to me. If I can outsource a task, particularly one as important as securing a qualified expert, I will jump at the opportunity. I use TASA in nearly every case where I need to find an expert witness, be it an engineer, an architect, an economist, etc. They have thousands of qualified experts to refer in virtually any field. Best of all the process is extremely simple. When I need an expert I simply contact TASA, whose knowledgeable representatives ask you targeted questions about your case, your legal theories, and your goals, in order to find the right expert for your case. I usually receive CVs and calls from the potential expert within hours. If you find the originally selected person is not a good fit – for whatever reason – TASA will work with you to find the right person. I would happily recommend this service to any attorney."

    Patrick K. Gibson, Gibson & Perkins PC, Media, PA

  • Ms. Darlie I. McDonald RN was awesome on the witness stand, and we prevailed in our case to the tune of  [a] (highly unusual [amount] for a medical malpractice [case] in our area).  I'd highly recommend her."

    Shane Reed, Shane A. Reed Law Office, Jacksonville, OR

  • I appreciate your inquiries and offers of assistance as well as the consistently high-quality, well-organized, and erudite TASA webinars, which invariably have excellent presenters."

    Maurice S. Kane, Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates PC, Riverside, CA

  • Steven Kursh was an outstanding technical expert on our ecommerce IP lawsuit. He completed a massive amount of work on extremely complicated material, in a very short period of time. His work product was first rate and I think he would have done a terrific job if the case proceeded to trial. He is very articulate and helped us. I only wish we had gotten him involved sooner in the litigation."

    Daniel J. Brown, Reiss Sheppe LLP, New York, NY

  • I thank you all for the response to my request for an expert witness...Both Mr. Scott and Mr. Bianchi appear to be well-qualified for this case, but we have hired another expert. As always, I was impressed by TASA's ability to produce exceptionally well-qualified candidates with great speed."

    John Thomas Dzialo, The Law Offices of John Thomas Dzialo, Santa Ana, CA

  • Thank you for your quick response and the names of the two proposed experts. The situation that gave rise to our search for these experts has resolved and we will not need to retain them. However, we will continue to keep TASA in mind as these needs arise from time to time as your breadth of coverage for experts of all types is unparalleled, in my experience."

    Bart W. Brizzee, County of San Bernadino, San Bernadino, CA

  • I have used TASA for the last five years for locating an expert for many personal injury cases. On each and every occasion, TASA was able to find me more than one qualified expert. With such a variety of experts, I was able to select one who met my client's needs in prosecuting these claims. I found the experts TASA referred not only qualified, but available on a moment's notice. Your fees are reasonable and fair, and I will continue to use TASA for the remainder of my career."

    Robert Oushalem, Esq., The Law Office of Robert Oushalem, San Jose, CA

  • I recently used TASA for the first time to locate an expert to testify in a case requiring rather unusual expertise and where there were no applicable regulations or standards for guidance. TASA referred an expert in California who was everything a lawyer looks for in a forensic expert. He was promptly available for consultation, efficiently prepared for deposition and trial and very persuasive and credible with the jury. TASA's administrative services and assistance in locating this expert were excellent, and we would certainly use both the expert and TASA in the future."

    Theodore Phillips, Miller Hauser Law Group, LLP, Placerville, CA

  • TASA has always given me first-class service, but in a recent matter, TASA found the 'needle-in-the-haystack' expert witness we feared didn't exist. We needed an expert for a very narrow and limited issue in a very narrow and limited industry. Because TASA has an extensive expert witness database, it was able to give us a referral almost on the spot. It's why I always turn to TASA first."

    Kathleen A. Herdell, Law Offices of Kathleen A. Herdell, St. Helena, CA

  • There are numerous companies that provide litigation experts. However, I always choose the TASA Group because of their quick response in finding a qualified expert for my particular case. I have extreme confidence in the TASA Group and will continue to use their services in the future."

    Katie A. Killion, Esq., Chiurazzi & Mengine, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA

  • I spent hours trying to locate an expert in a very technical case involving a defect in a medical device. I could have saved a lot of time by calling TASA first. Within hours, I was supplied with the name of an engineer who had more than 30 years of job training, education and expertise in the precise area involving the device. Bravo TASA!"

    Timothy W. Peach, Partner, Peach & Weathers, San Bernardino, CA

  • We were involved in a case pending for more than five years with seven parties from three states. Three mediations failed before we looked to TASA for an expert. TASA referred an expert who clearly understood the complexity of the project and could effectively support his opinion. If it weren't for his expert advice and deposition testimony, the case would not have settled. Interestingly, the case settled within 90 days from the date this expert began."

    Renee Colbert, Esq., Corporate Counsel, W.G. Tomko, Inc., Finleyville, PA

  • Using TASA to find experts for defending our client in a negligent homicide case ended up being one of the most important decisions we made in trial preparation. The experts they suggested were exactly what we needed for the case. I truly did not expect to find experts that would be such a perfect fit for the nature of case. TASA provided us with highly qualified experts in somewhat narrow fields of expertise. A large percentage of our victory is due to the experts recommended by TASA."

    Marta Farmer, Esq., Carl S. White Law Office, Haver, MT

  • I have used TASA's services since the 1980's and have never been disappointed. TASA is indispensable for locating that hard-to-find expert. TASA representatives have always been courteous and pleasant, with the attitude that they cannot do enough to help. I expect to continue using TASA throughout my career."

    Brad W. Greenberg, Esq., Smyth Law Offices, P.C., Brockton, MA

  • I needed to retain a multitude of scientists from a variety of disciplines for a complex litigation. Initially, I went through a series of interviews with an extremely knowledgeable and professional team of TASA advisors. They were able to find highly qualified experts in the specific fields, all of whom turned out to be superior in qualification and area of expertise to my adversary’s experts. I am a TASA believer!"

    Nooshin Namazi, Partner, Nicoletti Hornig & Sweeney, New York, NY

  • TASA always comes through in the difficult IP cases. Their representatives work with you to refine the search criteria and quickly send you a list of very qualified experts."

    Timothy L. Boller, Principal, Seed Intellectual Property Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA

  • Special thanks to our TASA referral advisor for her quick response to our initial request—we were extremely happy with how fast TASA was able to assist us! Your group does excellent work, and it is always my first stop when looking for an expert."

    Susanne K. Sullivan, Senior Attorney, Southwest Airlines Corporation, Dallas, TX

  • When we needed an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit, we turned to TASA. We were looking for a witness qualified in two unrelated technical areas, and TASA worked with us to identify and refine our requirements. TASA performed well, promptly providing us with several excellent candidates to consider, one of whom we retained."

    Joseph T. Miotke, Partner, IP Practice Group, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI

  • Our team had a very positive experience with TASA. The Expert was professional, efficient, and certainly an expert in his field. His work and testimony contributed to a winning decision for our client! We will recommend the Expert and TASA whenever appropriate."

    Stephanie Sprague, Esq., CT

  • (The Expert) WAS A PERFECT FIT for my case: qualified, competent, easy to work with, attentive to detail, knowledgeable, smart, communicative, enthusiastic, resourceful—have I left anything out? I highly recommend TASA and would be happy to share my experience with anyone else. Thank you!"

    Michael Porrazzo, Esq., The Porrazzo Law Firm, Mission Viejo, CA

  • The expert was very thorough. TASA was quick to respond with an answer to my request. I have used TASA in the past under various other law firms and have been pleased. TASA continues to live up to expectations and then some."

    Anne Desormier-Cartwright, Esq., Jupiter, FL

  • Your organization found us an appropriate expert witness in less than one day. This was excellent service. The expert you found was excellent and a pleasure to work with."

    William A. Ehrlich, Esq., Allentown, PA

  • (The Expert)…accomplished exactly what we wanted. TASA was very prompt and efficient in locating him. All fees were reasonable."

    J. Michael Lehman, Esq., Bruce, Bruce, & Lehman, Wichita, KS

  • We needed an Internet expert right away to meet a deadline. One phone call to TASA, and in less than a day, TASA called back with a list of 8-10 experts who were exactly what I needed. The TASA expert I chose knew the business and mechanics of the Internet so well—he was a PhD and professor who had written a book on the subject—that he put the fear of truth in the defendant that caused him to settle. When I get the kind of service that I did from TASA, I stick with it and use it again and again."

    Philip Green, Attorney at Law, Green and Green, San Rafael and San Francisco, CA

  • Excellent—in a word. I just do not have the time to hunt for experts. (The Expert) was fantastic. Thank you for providing such a quality service."

    Francesca Carinci, Esq., Steubenville, OH

  • TASA stands for Tops At Serving Attorneys. It’s always rewarding working with TASA."

    Marshall A. Bernstein, Esq., Philadelphia, PA.

  • That was, however, one of the best and most interesting webinars I've seen in the last few years.  Thank you for hosting it and introducing me to such a knowledgeable and caring person." - Referencing the Medicolegal Consequences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Civilian and Military Populations webinar. 

    Lori Bauer Apodaca, The Law Office of Lori Bauer Apodaca, Los Lunas, NM 

  • I needed a dental malpractice expert to assist me in a complex negligence claim. The very able staff at TASA had no difficulty identifying a knowledgeable professional who rendered a reasonable opinion in support of the case, which aided our client in receiving a fair amount of compensation. I am grateful to TASA for its invaluable assistance!"

    John Hermina, Hermina Law Group, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland & Washington, DC

  • For many years I have relied upon TASAmed to provide excellent medical malpractice experts. As a sole practitioner, I find it reassuring to know that a seasoned expert is just a call away. Usually, TASAmed has found just the right expert in a day or two. The support and guidance I receive from TASAmed is a vital part of my law practice, and I have come to expect both great service and high rewards from my TASA cases."

    Thomas J. Massey, The Thomas J. Massey Law Firm, Fallbrook, CA

  • The caliber of physicians that TASAmed has referred to us is superb. Prior referral groups used the same experts over and over again. With TASAmed I have access to experts all over the United States. I’m not limited to the same experts. The TASAmed staff is easy to work with and very professional, with an established track record. When I call for a medical expert, I’m called back the same day, and I often have an idea of what expert will be contacted before my first call is completed."

    Kari Alexander, Certified Legal Nurse Consultant, Texas

  • We hadn’t been able to find the medical expert we needed, and, frankly, I didn’t think we’d find one in that field. TASAmed was able to find us an expert with the exact expertise and medical experience we needed. Your referral advisor was very helpful and found our expert in one day."

    Kurt Osenbaugh, Partner, Alston & Bird, Los Angeles, CA

  • TASAmed’s service was prompt and efficient in connecting us with the right person. The expert was so cooperative and helpful. With how challenging it is to find a narrow area of medical expertise, it’s extra helpful to have your TASAmed pool to plug into instantaneously."

    Greg Roosevelt, Esq., Law Office of Greg Roosevelt, Edwardsville, IL

  • TASAmed has connected me to credible experts in four medical cases just this year. TASAmed and the referred experts respond quickly, the fees are reasonable, and the referrals are well tuned to the fields I request. Since the experts are already associated with TASAmed, they are comfortable having substantial conversations about the case, both before and after record review."

    Martin A. Cannon, Esq., Cannon Law Offices, Crescent, IA

  • I have used TASAmed a number of times and have always been happy with your give-and-take timeliness. Once I requested a medical expert in a particular field, but, after speaking with your referral advisor, we concluded that an expert in another field would be more effective. That same day, I spoke to two experts the advisor gave me, and I retained one."

    Mark A. Lope, Esq., Lope and Honlihan, Butler, PA

  • Very close to the time of trial, the TASAmed advisor quickly referred me to several experienced ER trauma physicians to review medical records and prepare me for cross-examination. After selecting my expert, I over-nighted records for review, and the doctor found valuable information for my client's defense. Thank you, TASAmed, for this timely, specific, valuable referral."

    Charles Morgan, Esq., Law Office of Charles L. Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, NC