The Future of Brands is No Brands - Here's why
Photo by Andrew Worley on Unsplash

The Future of Brands is No Brands - Here's why

The concept of brands will fade over time under the influence of bots, the sharing economy and the very recent ‛unbranding’ movement.

Brands are Big Business. A lot of cold hard cash is invested in keeping the names of Nike, Coca Cola, Louis Vuitton or Harley Davidson resonating in our heads. Successful brands make sure they embody as much a ‛lifestyle’ as they are representative of products and services. That’s the way they ease themselves into the minds and hearts of the consumer. But that’s about to change. There are several forces at work that will make the concept of a brand increasingly irrelevant and will have a huge impact on how we will market our companies, products and services.

Here’s what you need to know.

When bots obscure the interaction with consumers

Google Assistant, Apple’s Siri, Microsoft’s Cortana and Amazon Alexa have one thing in common: they are standing between our brand and the consumer. They’re the new gatekeepers. Consumers are no longer looking at rows and rows of shiny brands in retail stores or scrolling through them on websites. They have a need, voice it and Google Assistant or any other bot will take care of it for them. It will be a lot harder to influence the consumer if only the bot gets to analyse all the ‘yummie’ data that would otherwise have gone to the client-company. 

It’s actually something very similar to the ‘dumb pipe’ syndrome in the telco sector, when network service providers merely transfer bytes between a device and the internet, while being ignorant about the applications their customer accesses. Simply put: the network provider knows much less about its customer than the applications the latter is using. Likewise, the bots will know and control the buying process much more than brands do. And if the pre-sales interactions with the brands are fading, will their relevance not fade with them?

But the biggest question for me is: will people still ask for brands, then? Will they ask “Alexa, get me some Nestle milk” or “Alexa, get me some milk?”.

Sharing is no longer caring … about brands

An electric drill is quite an investment for many of us. So is buying a car. Before you buy them, you’ll obviously do a lot of research. And brands know that, of course. So, they make sure that you will cross their paths several times when investigating online which product will suit you the best, at the best price and the highest quality.

But that ceases to matter when you loan that car or that drill on a collaborative platform. You just need ‛a’ vehicle to drive you from A to B. You just care about finding ‘something’ that can make holes in wooden boards. The nature of the relationship between user (not customer) and brand becomes very different. It’s very volatile. There’s no commitment, on either side. The users do not really care about the brand. They just want the ‘thing’ to ‘work’, that’s all.

How unbranding is setting the pace

Some companies have already understood the dynamics above and are introducing the concept of ‛unbranding’. Because when the ‛brand’ itself decreases in relevance, the only thing that’s left is the ‛naked’ product: stripped of all the marketing BS that’s sometimes used to cover up its flaws.

There are some great examples out there. There’s ‛Not Company‛ whom we visited on one of our most recent Innovation Tours to Silicon Valley who sell ‘Not Milk’ and ‘Not Mayo’: vegan products that are completely animal-free. An even more interesting example is the online convenience store ‛Brandless’, where everything is $3 and ‛unbranded’. For example, tomato sauce is just labelled ‛Tomato Sauce’. Gluten-free blueberry muffin mix is just ‛Gluten Free Blueberry Muffin Mix’.

Both ‛Not Company’ and ‛Brandless’ tell a story of transparency and sustainability. They cater to the ‘new’ type of consumer out there that’s tired of our marketing stories and just wants to buy a good product, not the lifestyle story behind that product. But I don’t believe it’s a pure coincidence that this ‛ unbranding’ trend is happening at the same time that the dynamics above are pushing towards the increased irrelevance of brands.

Paradigm shifts never happen alone. They happen when several (apparently) unrelated dynamics come together into one big shift. And I believe that this ‛ unbranding’ is part of that. It probably won’t happen overnight, but if there is any time to reassess how you are selling your brand, then this is it.

Passionate about branding and the way consumers shop? Join nexxworks on our ‛Future of Shopping Tour’ in October!

Mark Blaylock

Associate Creative Director

6y

One of the biggest problems facing brands is not that the concept of following brands is disappearing, but that brands are throwing their brand commodity away. They no longer differentiate themselves from each other. Instead, they feel that the latest trend for bot personalisation (does anyone even believe in this anymore) is brand differentiation. They feel that content is a reason to purchase and that being the same as everyone else is being powerful - it is not. The two examples of 'non-brands' that you have cited are, ironically, behaving like brands and will generate their own brand loyalty because of this. Those Brands that don't understand marketing will disappear, those that do, will remain.

Spencer Buck

Founder & CCO @ Taxi Studio

6y

Utter rubbish. Commodity brands may suffer: milk is an easy target. Alexa, please (I hope we remain polite in utopia) get me some milk, oh and some beer, preferably probably the best beer in the world... oh, and some mints, my fave mints... you know, the mint with the hole. The reason brands exist is because people prefer and desire. So long as we continue to prefer and desire, I think not much changes at all.

Joanne G.

Cross-Sector Collaborations & Partnerships for Social Impact

6y

Interesting. I'm not so sure. A big part of the reason I buy "Clover" milk is the family lifestyle story that comes with the brand. It's deeply rooted in trust. I want to know where the milk is coming from before I serve it to my kids. At one point, we thought the "milkman" was obsolete, and then...Safeway added delivery. Now, Wholefoods is gearing up for drone delivery. Retailers have always sought ways reduce the cost of selling. Branding alleviated the sales pitch necessary to sell a product (apple). Then self-service (amazon, safeway) reduced the need for sales people. eCommerce streamlined distribution channels and gave consumers an instant price comparison tool. Now, nearly all consumer products can be home delivered. Business is constantly evolving, but it doesn't mean branding is dead.

Kevin Williams

Business Leader, Brand Builder & Marketing Strategist

6y

Anyone who believes this doesn't understand what a brand is. It is not a name, a mark or a logo - although each of these contribute in its own way to what a brand is. A brand is something (and it doesn't have to be a product or service) that resonates with someone for a specific reason. That will never go out of style!

Like
Reply
Roberto Cortese

Senior Director @ Ipsos Global | Pharma Data & Insights | Team Head | P&L Owner | Business Strategy & Development Leader | Entrepreneurial Spirit Award Winner

6y

Brave provocation, which I disagree with. 1) The "gatekeepers" are brands themselves. 2) Commoditization of services is not a new phenomenon. 3) Self-expression is a universal need, which is heavily met by brand choices. Hence, instead of a no brand scenario, we will likely see a realignment of branding towards higher benefits proposition. More and more choices will be automated, but brands will remain as guides.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics